Re: [MLUG - DISCUSSION] Palin Controversy

["Vern Green" <EMAIL:PROTECTED>]

I am sorry to have to post on this again, but I am pretty peeved right now.

 

Bryan, do yourself a favor and read this article:

 

http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/700499,CST-NWS-Obama-law17.article

 

You could have read it before, but chose to be ignorant.

 

Frankly, there is nothing indicting here, which was MY POINT all along. There is nothing indiciting with Palin according to your idiotic list.

 

But in my defense here, it was THIS ARTICLE that mentioned that Obama was suing on behalf of Poor African Americans. Not me. So get a grip!

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Bryan Venable <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:

Yes Vern, it's all The Blacks' fault.

I think this summarizes your worldview nicely, thanks for sharing.

Now expect this to be my last reply to anything you write, ever.

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Vern Green <EMAIL:PROTECTED> wrote:
> And Obama, in 1994 was a lawyer in a case that was brought against Citibank
> because they were not giving out enough loans to poor blacks.
>
> Obama may not have been the lead attorney on the case, but he was part of
> the case and is at least in part responsible for what we are seeing today.
>
> I think Obama is suspect, he earned $23000 for prosecuting Citibank and
> ultimately setting the stage for requiring banks to give out worthless loans
> that we are now being asked to pay for.
>
> So comparing that to a Governor that may or may not have asked for some
> books to be banned.
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Mike Miller <EMAIL:PROTECTED>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Jim Locke wrote:
>>
>> > A detailed account of the banning or attempt-to-ban books issues is
>> > here:
>> >
>> > http://www.snopes.com/politics/palin/bannedbooks.asp
>>
>> Here is my abbreviation:  Sarah Palin asked the librarian on three
>> occasions in the fall of 1996 how she would react if she were asked to ban
>> some books from the library.  In January 1997, just a couple of months
>> later, Palin fired the librarian because she didn't think the librarian
>> was fully supportive of Palin.  The townspeople complained loudly and the
>> librarian was reinstated.  Did Palin want the librarian to ban some books?
>> We don't know.  She isn't proven guilty, but I see no reason to declare
>> her innocent either:  She is a suspect.
>>
>>
>> > I get plenty of the "my morals/values and faith are the best and I want
>> > to lead this way" vibe from her.
>>
>> Definitely.  She "does not blink" because she is way more confident than
>> she should be.  It is pathological.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discussion mailing list
>> EMAIL:PROTECTED
>> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> F Vernon Green
>
> The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price,
> peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft
> living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
> Theodore Roosevelt
>
> _______________________________________________
> discussion mailing list
> EMAIL:PROTECTED
> http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>
>

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion

--
Thanks
F Vernon Green

The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
Theodore Roosevelt

_______________________________________________
discussion mailing list
EMAIL:PROTECTED
http://mlug.missouri.edu/mailman/listinfo/discussion